2004 Acura TL vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP) has 168 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | TL | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |
