2004 Acura TL vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | TL | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
