2004 Acura TL vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 131 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura TL. (323 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Acura | Ferrari |
| Model | TL | California |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 78 L |
