2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1961 Austin A 60
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (118 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (146 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1961 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 147 | A 60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 34 L |