2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (306 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 147 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |