2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. (181 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Alfa Romeo 147 2003 Ford Mustang
Make Alfa Romeo Ford
Model 147 Mustang
Year Released 2004 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 4599 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 556 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1250 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4230 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 68 L