2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (118 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (146 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 147 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | 147 | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |