2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Riley |
Model | 156 | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2870 mm |