2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1955 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1955 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1955 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 5112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2600 mm |