2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 1960 Cadillac 62
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 156 62
Year Released 2004 1960
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2492 cc 6390 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 173 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1460 kg 2200 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5730 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 3310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 79 L