2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 756 kg more than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |
