2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 530 kg more than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 95 L |
