2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (238 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 615 kg more than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3177 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |