2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 1976 Mazda RX-2
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 156 RX-2
Year Released 2004 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 148 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2480 mm