2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1980 Mazda 121
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1980 Mazda 121.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1980 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 156 | 121 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |