2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 has manual transmission. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |