2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, both 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (300 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 156 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |