2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (190 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | 156 | Pixo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2360 mm |