2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. (206 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 has manual transmission. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 156 | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |