2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Renault Clio

To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (190 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 (218 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 2012 Renault Clio
Make Alfa Romeo Renault
Model 156 Clio
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2492 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 60 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 94 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 68.3 mm 76.8 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 7.3 seconds 15 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1420 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 50 L