2004 Alpina B3 vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2004 Alpina B3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alpina B3 weights approximately 610 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Alpina B3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Alpina B3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2004 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alpina B3 | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Alpina | Honda |
Model | B3 | FCX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |