2004 Alpina B3 vs. 2001 BMW Z22
To start off, 2004 Alpina B3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Alpina B3. (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2004 Alpina B3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2004 Alpina B3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alpina B3 | 2001 BMW Z22 | |
Make | Alpina | BMW |
Model | B3 | Z22 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 3169 cc |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |