2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2004 Aston Martin DB9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | DB9 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5930 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 79 L |
