2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Aston Martin | Lotus |
Model | DB9 | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5930 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |