2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1969 Austin 1300
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1969 Austin 1300 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
| Model | DB9 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5930 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 36 L |
