2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Volvo |
| Model | DB9 | 240 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5930 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |
