2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1983 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1983 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DB9 | Allegro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5930 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 70 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |