2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1998 Audi AD
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 1998 Audi AD | |
Make | Aston Martin | Audi |
Model | DB9 | AD |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5930 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 570 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |