2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin DB9 | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | DB9 | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5930 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |