2004 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Aston Martin DB9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Aston Martin DB9 would be higher. At 5,930 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 545 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Aston Martin DB9 2005 Renault Clio
Make Aston Martin Renault
Model DB9 Clio
Year Released 2004 2005
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5930 cc 1460 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 450 HP 73 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 570 Nm 105 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 80.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 17.9:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 55 L