2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 2004 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 436 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin V12 weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (542 Nm) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: