2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1963 Seat 600

To start off, 2004 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 436 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin V12 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (542 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: