2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1972 Volvo 140

To start off, 2004 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 140. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin V12 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1972 Volvo 140. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (542 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 140. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 140.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Aston Martin V12 1972 Volvo 140
Make Aston Martin Volvo
Model V12 140
Year Released 2004 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5934 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 460 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 542 Nm 153 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1835 kg 1260 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2610 mm