2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1972 ZIL 114. (296 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 1972 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 2004 Aston Martin V12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Aston Martin V12. (542 Nm). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Aston Martin V12.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Aston Martin V12 | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | ZIL |
| Model | V12 | 114 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5934 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 3175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3770 mm |
