2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1983 Zagato Zeta
To start off, 2004 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zagato Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zagato Zeta would be higher.
Because 2004 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Zagato Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Zagato Zeta has automatic transmission and 2004 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2004 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Zagato Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin V12 | 1983 Zagato Zeta | |
Make | Aston Martin | Zagato |
Model | V12 | Zeta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |