2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2008 Volvo S60

To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin V12 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2008 Volvo S60.

Because 2004 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (542 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S60. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Aston Martin V12 2008 Volvo S60
Make Aston Martin Volvo
Model V12 S60
Year Released 2004 2008
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5934 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 460 HP 0 HP
Torque 542 Nm 240 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1835 kg 1440 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 12.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 70 L