2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP) has 351 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Aston Martin V12 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
| Model | V12 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5934 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 109 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |
