2004 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 5,934 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (460 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Aston Martin V12 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Aston Martin V12 weights approximately 347 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Aston Martin V12 (542 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 2004 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2004 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Aston Martin V12 | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | V12 | CX-5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5934 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 56 L |