2004 Audi A2 vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Simca Aronde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A2 (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A2 (140 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A2 | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Audi | Simca |
| Model | A2 | Aronde |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1190 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
