2004 Audi A2 vs. 1961 BMW 502
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A2 (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1961 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 BMW 502 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2004 Audi A2.
Because 1961 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A2 | 1961 BMW 502 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A2 | 502 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |