2004 Audi A2 vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 1,190 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Audi A2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A2 | 1963 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
Make | Audi | Willys-Overland |
Model | A2 | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1190 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2280 mm |