2004 Audi A2 vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2004 Audi A2. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 920 kg more than 2004 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A2 | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A2 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 82 L |
