2004 Audi A2 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A2 weights approximately 228 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A2 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A2 | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1190 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 702 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1170 mm |