2004 Audi A2 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,190 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Audi A2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A2 (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A2 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A2 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A2 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1190 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
