2004 Audi A2 vs. 1972 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A2 (60 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Audi A2.

Because 1972 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A2 (140 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi A2 1972 Zastava 1300
Make Audi Zastava
Model A2 1300
Year Released 2004 1972
Engine Size 1190 cc 1295 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 60 HP 53 HP
Torque 140 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 930 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 3830 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2430 mm