2004 Audi A2 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A2 (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A2 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A2 (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A2 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A2 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |