2004 Audi A2 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A2 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2004 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 468 kg more than 2004 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (453 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A2. (140 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A2. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi A2 has manual transmission. 2004 Audi A2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A2 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | A2 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1190 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 453 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |
