2004 Audi A3 vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1950 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1950 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A3 | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A3 | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2870 mm |