2004 Audi A3 vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom

To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2004 Audi A3. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 655 kg more than 2004 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi A3 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
Make Audi Rolls-Royce
Model A3 Phantom
Year Released 2004 1950
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1595 cc 5673 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 164 HP
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77.4 mm 114.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 6.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1860 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 5770 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1960 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 3690 mm