2004 Audi A3 vs. 1953 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2004 Audi A3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A3 | 1953 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | A3 | A6G |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |
